Reunion of family: Principles explained in detail about concept of reunion of joint family, manner in which to be proved, presumption against reunion after partition. The plaintiff’s case throughout was that the family continued to be joint after 7-11-1960 and defendant 1 who alone had filed the written statements and appeared in the witness box having come with the case of partition on 8.03.1981 which he claims to be implemented on 6.8.1984 by compromise decree. It is proved that family was joint at least till then i.e. 8.3.1981 or 6.8.1984. Thus, in a year 1979, when the residential property in question was acquired, the three branches were joint Para 103

[R. Janakiammal v. S.K. Kumarasamy, (2021) 9 SCC 114]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.