Arbitration clause contained in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was invoked by the petitioner but was opposed on the premise that the MOU ceased to exist on and from the date of the shareholder’s agreement(SHA) which superseded the MOU and novated the same. Held, is thus non-determinable by court at the stage of reference when it would result in a mini trial or elaborate review of facts and law.

Sanjiv Prakash v. Seema Kukreja and others, (2021) 9 SCC 732

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.