Held, For attracting S. 138, as per proviso (b) a demand notice demanding the “the said amount of money” needs to be made by the drawee of the cheque (Para 26) and an omnibus demand notice without specifying as to what was the amount due under the dishonoured cheque would not subserve the requirement of law. Para 27. Further, when a part-payment of the debt is made after the cheque was drawn but before the cheque is encashed, such payment, held, must be endorsed on the cheque under S. 56 and the cheque cannot be presented for encashment without recording the part-payment. Therefore, if the unendorsed cheque is dishonoured on presentation, the offence under S. 138 would not be attracted since the cheque does not represent a legally enforceable debt at the time of encashment. Para 33

[Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel v. Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel, (2023) 1 SCC 578]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.