The Supreme Court held that a preliminary enquiry in corruption cases, while desirable, is not mandatory under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The Court was hearing appeals against a Karnataka High Court decision which had quashed an FIR against Sri Channakeshava H.D., a public servant accused of corruption. The High Court noted that the Superintendent of Police had not conducted a preliminary enquiry before approving the investigation and hence there was no application of mind.

Relying on Lalita Kumari v Government of Uttar Pradesh (2014), P. Sirajuddin v State of Madras (1970) and State of Karnataka v T.N. Sudhakar Reddy (2025), the Supreme Court clarified that while preliminary enquiries may be advisable in corruption cases, they are not mandatory unless specified by law. The Court found the approval granted to the FIR by the Superintendent of Police valid. The Court reiterated that an accused public servant has no inherent right to be heard before registration of an FIR.

State of Karnataka v Sri Channakeshava H.D.

8 April 2025

Citations: 2025 INSC 471 |  2025 SCO.LR 4(8)

Bench: Sudhanshu Dhulia and K.V. Chandran

 Case Comment:

 In State of Karnataka v. Sri Channakeshava. H.D. (April 8, 2025), the Supreme Court of India ruled that a preliminary inquiry is not a mandatory requirement under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PC Act) for initiating a First Information Report (FIR) against a public servant. The court emphasized that the existence of credible material, such as a source report, considered by a competent officer like the Superintendent of Police, is sufficient to justify registering a case. 

 Key words/phrases: Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988—registration of FIR—corruption—public servant—preliminary enquiry not mandatory—accused has no inherent right to be heard

 Read the Judgement here.

 Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here: https://relegal.in/subscribe/

 #legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #POCA #corruption #preliminaryenquiry #publicservant #registrationofFIR #mandatory

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.