The Supreme Court held that a restitution of conjugal rights decree does not absolve a husband from paying maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), if the wife has valid reasons to live separately. 

Rina Kumari married Dinesh Kumar Mahto in 2014 but left in 2015, citing cruelty, dowry demands and lack of basic amenities. In 2018, Dinesh secured a restitution decree. Rina later filed a dowry harassment case and sought maintenance, which the Dhanbad Family Court allowed. But the Jharkhand High Court quashed the maintenance order, citing Rina’s non-compliance with the restitution decree.

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court’s ruling and restored the Family Court’s maintenance order. 

 Rina Kumari @ Rina Devi @ Reena v Dinesh Kumar Mahto @ Dinesh Kumar Mahato 

 10 January 2025

Citation: 2025 INSC 55 | 2025 SCO.LR 1(2)[9]

Bench: Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar

 

Case Comment

The Court held that a restitution decree alone cannot disqualify a wife from claiming maintenance. It emphasized that maintenance laws aim to prevent vagrancy and provide financial security to wives and children, aligning with principles of social justice. The judgment clarified that non-compliance with a restitution decree must be examined in the context of the wife’s reasons for refusal. Factors like mental cruelty, financial neglect, or other legitimate grievances must be considered before denying maintenance. Supreme Court Restores Wife’s Right to Maintenance Despite Decree for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. Held, Wife’s dignity and justified refusal outweigh procedural compliance under Section 125(4) Cr.P.C.

 Key words/phrases: Section 125 CrPC and maintenance rights—women’s rights to financial support—restitution of conjugal rights not absolute—judicial protection against marital cruelty

 

Read the Judgement here

 Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here: https://relegal.in/subscribe/

 #legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #RCR #sec125 #CrPC #maintenance #decree #financialsupport #cruelty

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.