The Supreme Court held that persons against whom criminal proceedings are pending are not absolutely disentitled to a passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967. Mahesh Kumar Agarwal, the appellant, sought renewal of his ordinary passport after its expiry while proceedings were pending before the NIA Court, Ranchi, and a criminal appeal against conviction […]
We Practice
FIXED PRICE SERVICES
- Trade Mark registration
- Agreement/ document Review
- Drafting petition/ writ / PIL/affidavit /written Submissions / Statement on Oath / Agreement / Deeds /MOUS
- Appearances before Tribunals, High Court, Supreme Court, AO, CIT(A), District and sessions court
- Company Incorporation
Today's Study
February 9, 2026
Yesterday's Study
Pre-trial Inquiry in Cheque Bounce Cases
February 6, 2026
The Supreme Court held that a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NIA) cannot be quashed at the pre-trial stage by carrying out an enquiry on the disputed question of fact. The appellant corporation lodged a complaint under Section 138 of the NIA, alleging that the cheque of Rs 20,00,000 issued […]
Interesting Webinars
Latest Updates
-
Disturbing: Supreme Court flags 7-year delay in murder trial, summons J&K Home Secretary. The Home Secretary was asked to submit details of all criminal trials in J&K in which accused persons are in jail for five years or more as undertrial prisoners.
-
Bank fraud: Anil Ambani to not leave India; Supreme Court orders ED to set up SIT. Among other directions, the Court today has also directed the CBI to ensure that any possible collusion by bank officials in the alleged fraud is investigated.
-
The Kerala High Court has ruled that Bar Associations are not "employers" under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), and therefore cannot form an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under this Act to inquire into sexual harassment complaints against advocates [E Shanavas Khan v The Kollam Bar Association & ors]
-
The Delhi High Court on Monday said that it cannot pass an order directing the government or the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to change the names of metro stations.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observed that naming the metro station falls within the administrative and policy domains of the government, which the Court does not interfere with unless it is arbitrary or violates the Constitution. -
Pune Porsche crash: Supreme Court grants bail to three accused of swapping blood samples
The Court granted bail to Aditya Sood, Ashish Mittal and Santosh Gaikwad after noting that they have been in jail for 18 months.
Chambers At:
Delhi Chamber
Chamber No 3A, Old Lawyers Chamber Block,
Patiala House Court Complex,
New Delhi 110001
Gurgaon Chamber
Block A1, H. No 68, lower Ground Floor,
Sushant Lok II,
Golf Course Road, Gurgaon 122011
Landline 0124-4061227