The Supreme Court held that a loanee cannot take advantage of their own breach to nullify a transaction. Only the aggrieved party could seek to set aside such a sale.

Machhindranath secured a loan from a co-operative society by putting his ancestral land as security. During the course of the loan, he signed a formal sale agreement in favour of his nephew for another loan, alongside a private agreement promising return of the land upon repayment. The nephew sold part of the land to a third party. Machhindranath filed a civil suit claiming that the sale was a security arrangement and argued that the sale deed would be void under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Trial Court ruled in his favour, but the High Court reversed it.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. It held that the provision on the voidability of the sale agreement could be invoked only by the aggrieved party, the co-operative society. As Machhindranath had broken the terms himself, he could not claim that the sale was void.

Machhindranath v Ramchandra Gangadhar Dhamne

2 June 2025

Citations: 2025 INSC 795 | 2025 SCO.LR 6(2)[6]

Bench: Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah

Read the Judgement here.

Case Comment

Held, It is settled principle of law that a man cannot be permitted to take undue and unfair advantage of his own wrong to gain favourable interpretation of law. It is sound principle that he who prevents a thing from being done shall not avail himself of the non-performance he has occasioned. To put it differently, “a wrongdoer ought not to be permitted to make a profit out of his own wrong”.’

Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here: https://relegal.in/subscribe/

 #legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #defaulter #voidsale #righttochallenge #loan #security

Keywords/phrases: Bombay High Court—order upheld—Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960—Section 48—defaulter may not declare sale void—society’s exclusive right to challenge—ex injuria sua nemo habere debet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.