Pre-trial Inquiry in Cheque Bounce Cases

The Supreme Court held that a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NIA) cannot be quashed at the pre-trial stage by carrying out an enquiry on the disputed question of fact. 

The appellant corporation lodged a complaint under Section 138 of the NIA, alleging that the cheque of Rs 20,00,000 issued by the respondent was declined owing to insufficient funds. After legal notice was issued, the respondent denied having issued the cheque and refused to make the payment. Subsequently, the trial court took cognisance of the complaint. Aggrieved by the summoning order of the trial court, the respondent appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, the High Court quashed the entire criminal proceeding, holding that the cheque was not issued for the discharge of debt or any other liability.

The Supreme Court held that at the pre-trial stage, the Court is only required to examine whether the material placed on record make out a prima facie case. It cannot carry out a detailed inquiry into the nature of debt or liability. Further, the Court stated that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 482 by conducting an inquiry at the pre-trial stage. 

Sri Om Sales v Abhay Kumar

19 December 2025

Citations: 2025 INSC 1474 | 2025 SCO.LR 12(5)[21]

Case comment

Held, Having regard to the aforesaid decisions of this Court as also the provisions of Section 139 of the N.I. Act, we are of the considered view that the High Court committed an error by conducting a roving enquiry, at the pre-trial stage, as regards the cheque being issued for the discharge of debt or liability. Such an exercise, in our view, was not merited in exercise of power under Section 482 of the Code more so when the complaint allegations disclosed that the cheque was issued for discharge of liability. As fulfillment of the necessary ingredients of Section 138 N.I. Act are prima facie made out from the complaint allegations, in our view, neither the summoning order nor the complaint could have been quashed by the High Court at the pre-trial stage.

Bench: Justices Manoj Mishra and Ujjal Bhuyan

Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here: https://legal.relegal.in/subscribe-newsletter/

#legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #chequebounce #NIAct #SEC482 #crpc #pretrialequiry #complaint

Key words/Phrases: Cheque dishonour–Section 138–Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881–Complaint–Section 482–Code of Criminal Procedure–Complaint Quashed–Appeal–Court cannot conduct pre-trial inquiry–Appeal allowed. 

Read the Judgement here

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE