Supreme Court flags an 87-year statutory vacuum under the Shariat Act in Gohar Sultan v. Sheikh Anis Ahmad. 87 years. No rules. One uncomfortable question from the Supreme Court: Can a legal right exist only on paper?

In Gohar Sultan v. Sheikh Anis Ahmad, the Supreme Court has turned the spotlight on a startling legislative vacuum: Section 3 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 grants a Muslim the statutory option to make a declaration to be governed by Shariat in specified personal matters, yet Section 4 rules — which prescribe the authority, form, and procedure for that declaration — remain unframed in key jurisdictions even after 87 years. The Court’s question is simple, but its implications are profound: can the State leave a statutory right on paper while withholding the machinery required to exercise it?

Gohar Sultan v. Sheikh Anis Ahmad
Citation: 2026 SCC OnLine SC 246
Bench: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih
Court: Supreme Court of India

The appeal arose from a dispute over the validity of a 1992 Will executed by a Muslim testatrix. The appellant argued that the testatrix intended to be governed by Muslim personal law. However, the Delhi High Court had held that because no formal declaration under Section 3 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 had been made, the Will had to be tested under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, with its stricter proof requirements. The appellant’s case before the Supreme Court was that such a declaration itself was practically impossible, because the rules under Section 4 — which are meant to prescribe the authority and procedure for making that declaration — had not been framed

The Court noted that without Section 4 rules, the Section 3 mechanism may become unworkable in practice. It therefore issued notice and sought responses from the Union of India and the State of Uttar Pradesh on why these rules had not been framed and what the current status was. Later reports indicate the Court expanded the inquiry by asking States/UTs to clarify the implementation position more broadly

Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here: https://legal.relegal.in/subscribe-newsletter/

 #legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #SupremeCourt #ConstitutionalLaw #MuslimPersonalLaw #ShariatAct #RuleOfLaw #LegalUpdate #CaseComment #AdministrativeLaw #AccessToJustice #RightsOnPaper

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE