LAW OFFICE
LOG IN
Referring to Shivshankar Singh v. State of Bihar (2012) 1 SCC 130, this court observed that it is evident that the law does not prohibit filing or entertaining of the…
In Rai Sandeep v. State (2012) 8 SCC 21 , the court had an occasion to consider who can be said to be a “sterling witness”. In para 22, it…
Suku, the absconding accused had formed an organization at Trichy under the name “Tamilar Pasarai” with the object of achieving separate statehood for Tamil Nadu and to blast Central and…
The Supreme court granted relief of clubbing together the two suits pending before the trial court. The respondent in his application stated certain facts that were not accurate. The explanation…
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal arrived at the sum of Rs 11,66,800 as total compensation payable after deducting 10% of the compensation on account of contributory negligence in as much…
The respondent filed an original suit stating that he was a tenant in the disputed shop and was wrongly being asked to vacate, declining to accept rent, seeking a permanent…
Held that the High Court exercises its jurisdiction only over state(s) of which it is a High court. It has no jurisdiction for the rest of the country. (2020) 5…
The borrower paid first 25 installments out of 40 and thereafter failed to pay the remaining installments. The lender filed a petition under section 64(1-A) of the Chit Funds Act,…
Principle reiterated and cases relied upon S Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P. (1996) 4 SCC 596; Magan Bihari lal v. state of Punjab (1977) 2 SCC 210; Ram Chandra…
Rambhau_Gawai_Nagpur_bench_Judgement_FAhouse wife compensation in accident
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:
The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.