Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Evidence Act, 1872 — Ss. 65-A and 65-B — Electronic evidence: Manner in which electronic evidence is to be proved, explained. Principles laid down in Anvar P.V., (2014) 10 SCC 473 as clarified in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar, (2020) 7 SCC 1, summarized.

Review petition re death sentence can be reheard even on procedural objections, including the mode and method of evidentiary proof, as the matter pertains to death sentence. “Normally in a criminal proceeding, review applications cannot be entertained except on the ground of error apparent on the face of the record. Further, the power given to […]

Evidence Act, 1872 — Ss. 65-A and 65-B — Electronic evidence: Manner in which electronic evidence is to be proved, explained. Principles laid down in Anvar P.V., (2014) 10 SCC 473 as clarified in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar, (2020) 7 SCC 1, summarized. Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 r/w S. 149 — Child eyewitness — Determination of credibility of — Age factor and duty of court

Evidence of child witness cannot be rejected merely because of her age being 12 yrs, but being a child witness, her evidence needs a very careful evaluation with greater circumspection considering the fact that a child witness can always be easily tutored. In the instant case, the   manner   in   which   the   minor   witness identified the

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 r/w S. 149 — Child eyewitness — Determination of credibility of — Age factor and duty of court Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302: Principles clarified relating to bail by suspending sentence in offence of murder, when permissible

something which is very apparent or gross on the face of the record, on the basis of which, the Court can arrive at a prima facie satisfaction that the conviction may not be sustainable. The Appellate Court should not reappreciate the evidence at the stage of Section 389 of the CrPC and try to pick

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302: Principles clarified relating to bail by suspending sentence in offence of murder, when permissible Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Kidnapping for ransom vis-à-vis kidnapping simpliciter -Relative scope of Ss. 364 and 364-A

Ingredients of offences under Ss. 364 and 364-A and distinction between them, clarified. Section 364. Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder. Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person in order that such person may be murdered or may be so disposed of as to be put in danger of being murdered, Section 364A further adds to

Penal Code, 1860 — Kidnapping for ransom vis-à-vis kidnapping simpliciter -Relative scope of Ss. 364 and 364-A Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 406, 420, 467, 468, 417 and 418 — Quashing of FIR — Dispute being essentially a civil dispute in nature

A breach of contract does not give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction. noting   that   the   present   dispute   is   entirely   with   respect   to property and more particularly buying and selling thereof a perusal of the record in no uncertain terms reflects the dispute as being of a civil nature. Further, merely the allegation of

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 406, 420, 467, 468, 417 and 418 — Quashing of FIR — Dispute being essentially a civil dispute in nature Read More »

Constitution of India — Arts. 32, 14, 19 and 21 — Maintainability of Challenge to judgment of Supreme Court

Writ petition maintainable on the ground that earlier judgment does not lay down the correct law-though the concept of finality of judgment has to be preserved, at the same time, the principle of ex debito justitiae cannot be given a go-bye. If the Court finds that the earlier judgment does not lay down a correct

Constitution of India — Arts. 32, 14, 19 and 21 — Maintainability of Challenge to judgment of Supreme Court Read More »

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE