Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 — Death sentence

Principles for imposition of death sentence, surveyed in detail. Practical guidelines framed for collection/collation of mitigating circumstances. This court in Bachan Singh had warned against categorising cases.96 Rejecting the contention that standards and guidelines should be laid down, it was noted in Bachan Singh that degree of culpability cannot be measured, and aggravating and mitigating […]

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 — Death sentence Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 167(2): Remand to police custody after elapse of the first 15 days from the date of arrest, whether/When permissible

It so happened that before the seven days police custody is over and before the CBI exercises the power of interrogation for full seven days which as per the order passed by the learned Special Judge was available to the CBI, the respondent-accused got himself hospitalised on 18.04.2021. On 21.04.2021, the learned Special Judge granted

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 167(2): Remand to police custody after elapse of the first 15 days from the date of arrest, whether/When permissible Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 167(2), 437(5) and 439(2) r/w Ch. XXXIII — Default bail

Principles clarified relating to permissibility of cancellation of default bail on merits after submission of charge-sheet. Held, From the above, the law, which emerges is that mere filing of the chargesheet subsequent to a person is released on default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. cannot be a ground to cancel the bail of a person,

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 167(2), 437(5) and 439(2) r/w Ch. XXXIII — Default bail Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 313(1)(b) and 313(5) [as inserted in 2009] — Preparation of relevant questions for Examination of accused

Principles summarized relating to duty of court after insertion of S. 313(5) which enables court to take assistance of Public Prosecutor and defence counsel.  What follows from these authorities may briefly be summarized thus: section 313, Cr. P.C. [clause (b) of sub-section 1] is a valuable safeguard in the trial process for the accused to

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 313(1)(b) and 313(5) [as inserted in 2009] — Preparation of relevant questions for Examination of accused Read More »

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — S. 2(12) — Plea of Juvenility

Principles clarified relating to effect of determination of juvenility after conviction at stage of appeal, on status of trial, conviction and sentence recorded by trial court and appellate court. The appeal preferred by the appellant was dismissed by the High Court and the death reference forwarded by the Trial Court was affirmed, During the pendency

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — S. 2(12) — Plea of Juvenility Read More »

Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 — Rr. 6(b)(i) and 6(b)(ii) — Valuation — Captive consumption of goods

Principles clarified relating to approach to be adopted for determination of normal price and determination of applicability of R. 6(b)(i) or (ii) of the 1975 Rules. Held, Having considered the records and the submissions of the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order cannot be faulted. This Court in its judgment

Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 — Rr. 6(b)(i) and 6(b)(ii) — Valuation — Captive consumption of goods Read More »

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302, 376 & 201 — Brutal rape and murder of minor — Death sentence

The heinous nature of crime like that of present one, in brutal rape and murder of a seven-year-old girl child, definitely discloses aggravating circumstances, particularly when the manner of its commission shows depravity and shocks the conscience. But at the same time, it is noticeable that the appellant has no criminal antecedents, comes from a

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302, 376 & 201 — Brutal rape and murder of minor — Death sentence Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 427 — Consecutive or concurrent running of sentences

Normal rule is that such subsequent sentence shall run consecutively. However, court has discretion under S. 427(1) to direct that subsequent sentence shall run concurrently. Held, Section 427 provides that when a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment or imprisonment for life, such imprisonment or imprisonment for

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 427 — Consecutive or concurrent running of sentences Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 319 — Summoning of additional accused

Principles summarized relating to parameters for summoning of additional accused under this section. The parameters on which additional accused could be summoned in an application filed under Section 319 CrPC are well settled in the case of Hardeep Singh and Ors.’s case (supra) which are as under: “105. Power u/s 319 CrPC is a discretionary

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 319 — Summoning of additional accused Read More »

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE