Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Constitution of India — Art. 32

In this case, On October 3, 2021, eight people were killed after a vehicle belonging to and allegedly being driven by son of senior politician mowed down the protesting farmers, among others. There was incident of violence leading to multiple deaths and injuries involving son of senior politician/sitting Minister of the Union Government, which took […]

Constitution of India — Art. 32 Read More »

Service Law- Retirement/Superannuation — Interpretation of Cl. 17(7)(iii) of ITI Certified Standing Orders on Age of retirement/superannuation

In terms of Cl. 17(7), employee attaining 58 yrs of age “may” be continued in service up to 60 yrs of age subject to medical fitness. Cl. 17(7)(iii) is only an enabling provision that enables appellant to continue employee who had attained 58 yrs of age up to 60 yrs provided he/she is medically fit

Service Law- Retirement/Superannuation — Interpretation of Cl. 17(7)(iii) of ITI Certified Standing Orders on Age of retirement/superannuation Read More »

Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 — Ss. 43(1) & (2), 44(1)(a) and 44(1)(c) r/w S. 4 — Determination of Territorial jurisdiction of Special Court

Law clarified on the issue that whether the trial of offence of money-laundering should follow the trial of the scheduled/predicate offence or vice versa. Held, Therefore, the question of territorial jurisdiction in this case requires an enquiry into a question of fact as to the place where the alleged proceeds of crime were (i) concealed;

Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 — Ss. 43(1) & (2), 44(1)(a) and 44(1)(c) r/w S. 4 — Determination of Territorial jurisdiction of Special Court Read More »

Income Tax — Tax Deducted at Source (TDS)/Tax at Source (TAS): Manner of receiving commission/origination of amount, as in the present case from customers to travel agents, is irrelevant for TDS applicability

Held, Our conclusion in terms of the application of Section 194H of the IT Act to the Supplementary Commission amounts earned by the travel agent is unequivocally in favour of the Revenue. Section 194H is to be read with Section 182 of the Contract Act. If a relationship between two parties as culled out from their intentions as manifested in the

Income Tax — Tax Deducted at Source (TDS)/Tax at Source (TAS): Manner of receiving commission/origination of amount, as in the present case from customers to travel agents, is irrelevant for TDS applicability Read More »

Insurance — Contract of Insurance /Policy: Duty of insurer to disclose exclusion clause- Exemption/Exclusion/Restriction/Limitation/Forfeiture Clauses

Law comprehensively clarified regarding effect of non-discharge of duty of insurer to disclose exclusion clause by insurer and non-compliance of statutory mandate under IRDA Regulations, 2002 in this regard. Held, there is an onerous responsibility on the part of the insurer while dealing with an exclusion clause. We may only add that the insurer is statutorily

Insurance — Contract of Insurance /Policy: Duty of insurer to disclose exclusion clause- Exemption/Exclusion/Restriction/Limitation/Forfeiture Clauses Read More »

Criminal Trial — Circumstantial Evidence — Generally — Proving case based on circumstantial evidence: Principles reiterated regarding matters to be established for proving case based on circumstantial evidence

It has been held by this Court in a catena of cases including Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra reported at (1984) 4 SCC 116, that suspicion, howsoever strong, cannot substitute proof beyond reasonable doubt. This Court has held that there is not only a grammatical but also a legal distinction between ‘may’ and

Criminal Trial — Circumstantial Evidence — Generally — Proving case based on circumstantial evidence: Principles reiterated regarding matters to be established for proving case based on circumstantial evidence Read More »

Constitution of India — Arts. 226, 30 and 19(1)(g) — Maintainability of writ petition against private person or body

If action impugned before writ court has no nexus with public element, even though the private body in question may be discharging public function, held, writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked in such a case. Held, It must be consequently held that while a body may be discharging a public function or performing a public duty

Constitution of India — Arts. 226, 30 and 19(1)(g) — Maintainability of writ petition against private person or body Read More »

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE