Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Curative Power in Cases Involving Opposing Outcomes Based on Identical Evidence 

The Supreme Court held that it may exercise its curative powers to prevent arbitrary disparity of outcomes in separate cases relying on identical evidence. It found that allowing a conviction based on evidence that was rejected as inadmissible in identical cases violates Articles 14 and 21.  Surendra Koli was convicted for killing Rimpa Haldar. This was alleged to

Curative Power in Cases Involving Opposing Outcomes Based on Identical Evidence  Read More »

Magistrate’s Power to Order an FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC

Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v State of Karnataka 4 November 2025 Citations: 2025 INSC 1282 | 2025 SCO.LR 11(2)[12] The Supreme Court held that when allegations in a private complaint disclose the commission of a cognisable offence, the Magistrate may order the registration of an FIR and investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC).

Magistrate’s Power to Order an FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC Read More »

Magistrate’s Power to Order an FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC

Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v State of Karnataka 4 November 2025 Citations: 2025 INSC 1282 | 2025 SCO.LR 11(2)[12] The Supreme Court held that when allegations in a private complaint disclose the commission of a cognisable offence, the Magistrate may order the registration of an FIR and investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC).

Magistrate’s Power to Order an FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC Read More »

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE