Digest Of Supreme Court Cases

Constitution of India – Interpretation of Preventive detention laws in the light of Arts. 21 & 22 and Art. 19

When a person is preventively detained Arts. 21 & 22 are attracted and not Art. 19. Hence, to tear observations made in Madhu Limaye case out of context would be fraught with danger when it comes to liberty of person under Art. 21. Hence, contention that liberal meaning must be given to the expression “public […]

Constitution of India – Interpretation of Preventive detention laws in the light of Arts. 21 & 22 and Art. 19 Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 482 and 156(3) — Extraordinary relief of stay of further proceedings in complaint cases, including stay on arrest of accused persons

Grant of, by High Court under S. 482: It is permissible for High Court to pass an interim order under S. 482 CrPC of the nature impugned herein, in exceptional cases with caution and circumspection, giving at least brief reasons. What is not permissible is the tendency of the courts to pass blanket, cryptic, laconic, non-speaking

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 482 and 156(3) — Extraordinary relief of stay of further proceedings in complaint cases, including stay on arrest of accused persons Read More »

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days

Held, unequals are being treated equally in that  no differentiation is made by the third proviso between the assessees who are responsible for delaying the proceedings and assessees who are not so responsible- since the objective was automatic vacation of stay granted on the completion of 365 days whether or not the assessee is responsible

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 254(2-A) (as amended by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 1-10-2008): Third proviso to S. 254(2-A), limiting extension of stay order to a maximum period of 365 days Read More »

Disaster Management Act, 2005 — Ss. 12(iii), 48, 6(1) and 6(2)(g) – constitution of India (Art.21)— Notified disaster

Ex gratia monetary compensation to families of deceased who have succumbed to pandemic of COVID-19: Word “shall” used in S. 12, held, cannot be interpreted and considered as “may”. It is mandatory for National Authority to recommend guidelines for minimum standards of relief to be provided to persons affected by disasters including ex gratia assistance

Disaster Management Act, 2005 — Ss. 12(iii), 48, 6(1) and 6(2)(g) – constitution of India (Art.21)— Notified disaster Read More »

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 197 — Previous sanction for prosecution of public servant

S.197 CrPC seeks to protect officer from unnecessary harassment, who is accused of offence committed while acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duties and, thus, prohibits court from taking cognizance of such offence except with previous sanction of competent authority. At the same time, such shield cannot protect corrupt officers and

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 197 — Previous sanction for prosecution of public servant Read More »

Service Law — Pay — Entitlement to, if any, to Revision of pay —— Factors to be considered when employer does decide to revise pay and Relevance of Financial constraints of employer

Principles clarified re three broad sets of employers viz. (i) Employers in organised sector like industry; (ii) Employers in public sector undertakings including Boards and Corporations and other establishments which meet test of “State” within meaning of Art. 12 of the Constitution; and (iii) Central and State Governments proper as employers. As far as first

Service Law — Pay — Entitlement to, if any, to Revision of pay —— Factors to be considered when employer does decide to revise pay and Relevance of Financial constraints of employer Read More »

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE