Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 378(3) read with Sections 378(1) and (2) — Leave to appeal against judgment of acquittal

The case arose from the murder of political leader Ramavatar Jaggi in 2003. The State police initially registered an FIR and filed a charge sheet; however, due to dissatisfaction expressed by the victim’s family, the investigation was later transferred to the CBI, which filed a fresh charge sheet implicating, among others, Amit Jogi. The trial court convicted several accused but acquitted Amit Jogi. The State of Chhattisgarh, the CBI, and the de-facto complainant each sought to challenge the acquittal before the High Court. The High Court dismissed the State’s appeal as not maintainable, rejected the victim’s appeal under Section 372 CrPC as being inapplicable to pre-2009 acquittals, and dismissed the CBI’s delayed leave-to-appeal application. 

Held: The Supreme Court reaffirmed that in cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment/CBI, the authority to file an appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 378 CrPC lies exclusively with the Central Government. Consequently, the State Government has no locus to file such an appeal. The Court upheld the correctness of the three-Judge Bench decision in Lalu Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar, declined to refer the issue to a larger Bench, and held that a victim’s appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC is maintainable only for acquittal orders passed after 31 December 2009.

Case Comment

In State of Chhattisgarh v. Amit Aishwarya Jogi (2025), the Supreme Court of India ruled that only the Central Government/CBI has the authority to appeal the 2007 acquittal of Amit Jogi in a 2003 murder case, dismissing appeals by the State upholding the High Court’s rejection of their challenges as being non-maintainable under Section 378 CrPC and the proviso to Section 372 CrPC respectively. The Court allowed the CBI’s appeal, condoned the delay of 1373 days in filing the application for leave to appeal, and remitted the matter to the High Court to consider the CBI’s application on merits after issuing notice to the respondent-accused.


Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here:

https://legal.relegal.in/subscribe-newsletter/

 #legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #CrPc #maintainability

 #Murder #Conspiracy #AttemptToMurder

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE