Debit freezing/attaching bank accounts without Magistrate’s order under Section 107 BNSS illegal

In the instant matter, the petitioners are engaged in the business of buying and selling gold ornaments, gold bars, coins and precious stones and have been carrying on such business in compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. In July 2024, a company named Dallas E-com Infotech Private Limited (“the Customer”) approached the petitioners for the purchase of gold items. Prior to entering into any transactions, the petitioners undertook due diligence and complied with Know Your Customer (KYC) norms and the transactions were carried out through regular banking channels. Between August 2024 and March 2025, transactions aggregating to approximately ₹14,20,74,954.99/- were conducted with the Customer. Subsequently, complaints were lodged by third parties against the Customer alleging fraud. No complaint, FIR or proceeding was registered against the petitioners. Despite this, respondent authorities issued communications to respondent banks directing that the bank accounts of petitioner 1, Malabar Gold and Diamond Ltd., be put on hold/frozen….

Held, “It is fairly trite now that Section 106 of the BNSS empowers the police only to seize property for evidentiary purposes and does not confer any authority to attach or debit-freeze bank accounts. Attachment or freezing of bank accounts, being measures directed at securing alleged proceeds of crime, can be undertaken only under Section 107 of the BNSS and strictly upon orders of a competent Magistrate, after following the prescribed procedural safeguards….

Case Comment

Blanket freezing of accounts of persons who are neither accused nor suspects is arbitrary, disproportionate and violative of Articles 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. While deciding the legality of bank account freezing under BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) of a business entity’s bank accounts on the basis of transactions with a third party accused of cyber fraud, in the absence of any allegation or material indicating the account holder’s complicity, a Single-Judge Bench of Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J., allowed the writ petition and held that the freezing of the petitioners’ bank accounts, without Magistrate’s order under Section 107 BNSS, was unjustified and illegal.

Malabar Gold and Diamond Ltd. v. Union of India, 2026 SCC OnLine Del 297, Decided on 16-01-2026

Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here:

#legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #freezingofaccount #proceedsofcrime    #cyberfraud  #BNSS #sec106 #constitutionofindia #applicationofmind

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE