Leading Questions in Cross-Examination

The Supreme Court held that leading questions are permissible in cross-examinations and that answers elicited in response do not, for that reason alone,  lose probative value. The Court further noted that omissions in examination-in-chief can be fixed at the time of cross-examination.

In 1998, the appellant executed a will bequeathing his properties to eight of his nine children, excluding his daughter, who had married outside the community. In 2011, the daughter filed a suit seeking partition of the property. The trial court ruled in her favour, noting that the testimony of the sole surviving attesting witness did not satisfy the requirement for valid execution of the will, owing to the material omission of certain facts during examination-in-chief. The verdict was upheld by the High Court, noting that answers elicited through leading questions in cross-examination could not cure omissions in examination-in-chief.

The Supreme Court held that the probative value of answers given in cross-examination cannot be denied merely because the questions were leading. The Court further noted that the standard of proof required for a will that excludes one legal heir is less stringent than that applicable to a will that divests all legal heirs.

K.S. Dinachandran v Shyla Joseph

17 December 2025

Citations: 2025 INSC 1449 | 2025 SCO.LR 12(4)[16]

Case Comment

Bench: Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and K.V. Chandran

Subscribe to our updates now and be the first to know about the latest news and developments. Subscribe here: https://legal.relegal.in/subscribe-newsletter/

#legalcousel #legalawareness #legaladvice #will #crossexamination #leading questions

Keywords/phrases: Will–Excluding one out of nine children–Suit for partition of property–Disposition by attesting witness–Requisites of a valid will not satisfied–Verdict upheld by High Court- Challenge to Supreme Court–Probative value of leading questions undeniable–Leave granted  Read the Judgement here. https://www.scobserver.in/supreme-court-observer-law-reports-scolr/k-s-dinachandran-v-shyla-joseph-leading-questions-in-cross-examination/

Terms & Conditions

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use.
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising. I AGREE