There was an allegation of terror funding as the accused allegedly paid levy/ extortion amount to certain terrorist organizations. Sec 43-D (5) proviso entails expression “prima facie true” as in it must be good and sufficient on its face to establish a given fact or the chain constituting the stated offense unless rebutted or contradicted.

While considering the grant of bail, it is the bounden duty of the Court to apply its mind to examine the entire material on record for the purpose of satisfying itself, whether a prima facie case is made out against the accused or not. Held, we have gone through the material on record and are satisfied that the appellant is entitled for bail and that the special Court and the High Court erred in not granting bail to the appellant. Para 13

(2021) 4 SCC 704- Sudesh Kedia V Union Of India  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Do not copy the content of this website.

Terms And condition

The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:

  1. The user wishes to gain more information about Re Legal, its practice areas for his/her own information and use
  2. That the information provided in the website is only for personal use or reference of the visitor and is provided only on his/her specific request.
  3. That the material available for downloading on the website and other information provided on the website would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  4. That we are not responsible for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website.
  5. That in case the visitor has any legal issues; he or she should seek independent legal advice.

The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.