In this case, dispute between appellant and R-4 concerning alleged right to way of R-4 decided by Revenue Authorities against appellant., that order was challenged before High Court as appeal was dismissed. While dismissing the writ petition, High Court passed cryptic order without considering essential issues. Without going into questions whether there was any easement or right in favour of Respondent 4 on the basis of which he could have demanded and could have granted access through the property of the appellant. The Supreme Court held that the High Court ought to have considered essential issues arising in the matter in more detailed manner. Hence, writ petition was restored for decision afresh in accordance with law.
[Sulochanabai Swaropchand Chawre v. Commr., Amravati, (2021) 9 SCC 317]