Requirement of giving reasons for the decision is of the essence and is virtually a part of “due process”. Clarified, however, that while the court is not required to give elaborate reasons while granting bail, an order dehors any reasoning whatsoever cannot result in grant of bail. Where the accused summoned under sec 319 of CrPC resisted arrest for a period of approximately three and a half months and remained absconding held to be a glaring instance of gross violation of the court’s order and rule of Law. Thus, if bail is granted in a casual manner, the prosecution or the informant has a right to assail the order before a higher forum.
[Jaibunisha v. Meharban, (2022) 5 SCC 465]