Parents’ demands not important in child custody cases
child’s will in custody matter_Aneesh_v_Aswathy_
LAW OFFICE
LOG IN
child’s will in custody matter_Aneesh_v_Aswathy_
Expenses incurred by pharmaceutical company for distribution of incentives i.e. “freebies” to medical practitioners/doctors are not eligible for the benefit of S. 37(1) of the IT Act, 1961 It is…
Admissibility of additional evidence under Or. 41 R. 27 CPC does not depend upon the relevancy of the issue on hand, or whether the applicant had an opportunity for adducing such evidence at an earlier…
Conspiracy and membership of appellant in conspiracy to rob and murder shop-owner rich in cash and gold from money-lending business, instigated by his employee along with other co-accused, including appellant,…
Certificate under S. 65-B(4), Evidence Act is mandatory for production of electronic evidence, oral evidence in place of such certificate cannot suffice. Evidence supporting conviction of accused in kidnapping and committing murder of…
In this case, material clearly established that after deceased fell down with the help of co-accused, accused K kicked and assaulted deceased on his neck with his legs and hands.…
[2023] 147 taxmann.com 39 (Article)
The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from soliciting work or advertising in any manner. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the user acknowledges that:
The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only and solely available at your request. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.